Resource Management Act 1991

Resource Management Project Training
Southern Project Group offers enterprise solutions for Microsoft Project Server 2003 EPM; including help in full configuration, enterprise roll-out, and training.
www.southernprojectgroup.com

Resource Management Act 1991 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Resource Management Act 1991. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Jump to: navigation, search. Resource Management Act 1991. Parliament of New Zealand. Long ...
en.wikipedia.org

Resource management - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the New Zealand law, see Resource Management Act 1991. In organizational studies, resource management is the efficient and effective ...
en.wikipedia.org

Warning: mkdir() [function.mkdir]: Permission denied in /home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line 12

Warning: mkdir() [function.mkdir]: No such file or directory in /home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line 12

Warning: fopen(/home/templatecore2cache//*cluesnet.com/a0/a0f1fb25f8472edd0fd7efc3430d4e6943dfa51d.tc2cache) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line 130

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line 131

Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line 132

{{Infobox NZ Legislation|short_title= Resource Management Act 1991||long_title=An Act to restate and reform the law relating to the use of land, air, and water.|introduced_by=Simon Upton [1991 [1991 [1991, [1994, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 in [New Zealand. The RMA regulates access to natural and physical resources such as land, air and water, with sustainability of these resources being the overriding goal. New Zealand's Ministry for the Environment describes the RMA as New Zealand's principal legislation for environmental management. Resource Management Act (from the Ministry for the Environment (New Zealand) website, retrieved 2007-07-31)

The RMA was significant for three reasons. Firstly, the RMA established one integrated framework that replaced the many previous resource-use regimes, which had been fragmented between agencies and sectors, such as land use, forestry, pollution, traffic, zoning, water and air. Fisher, D. E. (1991), The resource management legislation of 1991: A judicial analysis of its objectives, in Resource Management, Brooker and Friend Ltd, Wellington, Vol. 1A, Intro 1-30. p 2, 2nd paragraph. Secondly, the RMA was the first statutory planning regime to incorporate the principle of sustainability. Smith, G. (1997). The Resource Management Act 1991 - "A biophysical bottom line" vs "a more liberal regime"; a dichotomy? Canterbury Law Review 6: 499-538, p 501. Finally, the RMA incorporated ‘sustainable management’, as an explicitly stated purpose placed at the heart of the regulatory framework Harris, B. V. (1993) Sustainable management as an express purpose of environmental legislation: the New Zealand attempt - Otago Law Review 8: 51-76. and this purpose is to direct all other policies, standards, plans and decision-making under the RMA. Fisher, D. E. (1991), Op cit, p 11, 2nd paragraph Having the purpose of the RMA at the apex of an unambiguous legislative hierarchy was a unique concept worldwide at the time of the law's inception.Fisher, D. E. (1991), Op cit. p 11, first paragraph.

As the law and the decisions springing from it in court affect both individuals and businesses in large numbers, and often in very tangible ways, the law has variously been attacked for being toothless in reigning in unscrupulous businesses, or to the contrary, overly concerned with bureaucratic restrictions on legitimate economic activities.

Beginnings Following the New Zealand National Party antipathy to environmental issues in the 1980s, as expressed in the Think Big economic development projects and the National Development Act, the New Zealand Labour Party went into the New Zealand general election, 1984 campaign with a platform of reforming planning and local government institutions and adopting better environmental policies.Wheen, N. (2002) A history of New Zealand environmental law. pp 261-274, In Environmental histories of New Zealand, edited by Pawson, E. and Brooking,T. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, page 269. The reform policy would involve creating an integrated resource decision making system to replace the existing sectoral based system. The Labour Party environment policy, such as this quote from Part I, paragraph 3, owes much to the Brundtland Commission's concept of sustainable development;Fisher, D. E. (1991), Op cit. p 2, fifth paragraph.to ensure the management of the human use of the biosphere to yield the greatest sustainable benefits to present generations while maintaining the potential to meet the the goods and aspirations of future generations

Resource Management Law Reform In New Zealand general election, 1987 the Fourth Labour Government of New Zealand won a second term in office and Deputy Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer (politician) became the Minister for the Environment. Palmer initiated a comprehensive reform project for New Zealand's environmental and planning laws. This was the Resource Management Law Reform or RMLR. Palmer's objectives explicitly included giving effect to the Treaty_of_Waitangi, cost-effective use of resources, the World Conservation Strategy, intergenerational equity, and intrinsic values of ecosystems. Palmer chaired a Cabinet committee supervising a core group of four people supported by the Ministry for the Environment. The core group developed policy through a series of 32 working papers and through extensive public consultation. In December 1988, the reform proposals were published. In December 1989, Palmer introduced the 314-page Resource Management Bill to the NZ Parliament. The Select Committee process was not completed by the New_Zealand_general_election,_1990 , which Labour lost. However, the new New_Zealand_National_Party Minister for the Environment, the hon. Simon Upton continued the law reform process leading to the enactment of the RMA. Palmer, G., (1991). "Sustainability - New Zealand's resource management legislation." Resources: the Newsletter of the Canadian Institute of Resources Law No 34: 6 pp 3-10.

Final drafting of the RMA The new Minister, Simon Upton, noted the divergent views of submitters on the proposed purpose and principles of the Bill. A Cabinet paper of 10 March 1989 argued that the overall objectives and the broad philosophy of the Bill should be stated in a purpose section and clarified in a section on fundamental principles. After the New_Zealand_general_election,_1990, Upton appointed a Review Group to assess the purpose and principle clauses.

The Review Group considered that the clauses had become a conflicting 'shopping list' of matters advanced by interest groups, with no clear priority. That would result in trading off or balancing of socio-economic and biophysical aspects. They rejected such a balancing approach in favour of use within biophysical constraints. They considered that the Bill should not have a purpose of sustainable development with a focus on social justice and wealth redistribution. They concluded that purpose of the Bill should be 'sustainable management' and that the critical aspect of that purpose should be intergenerational equity, that is, safeguarding natural resource options for future generations. A second purpose of avoiding, remedying or mitigating adverse effects of activities was added. The purpose and principles sections were consequently rewritten.

Finally, with the approval of Cabinet, Upton added the third 'sustainable management' purpose of safeguarding the life-supporting capacity of air, water, soil and ecosystems.Upton, S., (1995) "Purpose and Principle in the Resource Management Act" Waikato Law Review 1995 Vol 3, pp 17-55. Also available as "The Stace Hammond Grace Lecture: Purpose and Principle in the Resource Management Act"

Upton stated in his third reading speech to Parliament that the purpose of the RMA was not concerned with planning and controlling economic activity, nor about trade-offs, but about sustaining, safeguarding, avoiding, remedying, and mitigating the adverse effects of the use of natural resources.The Bill provides us with a framework to establish objectives with a biophysical bottom line that must not be compromised. Provided that those objectives are met, what people get up to is their affair. As such, the Bill provides a more liberal regime for developers. On the other hand, activities will have to be compatible with hard environmental standards and society will set those standards. Clause 4 sets out the biophysical bottom line. Clauses 5 and 6 set out further specific matters that expand on the issues. The Bill has a clear and rigorous procedure for the setting of environmental standards - and the debate will be concentrating on just where we set those standards.(July 1991) 51b Hansard, Resource Management Bill Third Reading, 3018-3020.

Part 2 Purpose and Principles The result of Upton's input was that RMA was enacted with a Part 2 consisting of three 'principles' (sections 6,7 & 8) in an unambiguous hierarchy below the overarching purpose of 'sustainable management', set out in section 5.Fisher, D. E. (1991), Op cit. p 8-10. Under that section, the RMA has one specifically defined purpose; to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources.Resource Management Act, Section 5(1) - Parliament of New Zealand, 1991

Definition of sustainable management The RMA, in Section 5, describes sustainable management as managing the use, development and protection of natural and physical resources in a way, or at a rate which enables people and communities to provide for their social, economic, and cultural well-being and for their health and safety while-

(a) Sustaining the potential of natural and physical resources (excluding minerals) to meet the reasonably foreseeable needs of future generations; and

(b) Safeguarding the life-supporting capacity of air, water, soil, and ecosystem; and

(c) Avoiding, remedying or mitigating any adverse effects of activities on the Natural environment.Resource Management Act, Section 5(2) - Parliament of New Zealand, 1991

Principles Section 6 is list of matters of national importance that shall be 'recognised and provided for' in acheiving the purpose of the RMA;Resource Management Act, Section 6 - Parliament of New Zealand, 1991

natural character of the coastal environment:
outstanding natural features and landscapes:
significant indigenous habitats and vegetation:
public access to waterbodies:
Maori culture, traditions, ancestral lands, water, sites, waahi tapu, and taonga:
historic heritage:
recognised customary activities.

Section 7 is list of matters that all decisions 'shall have particular regard to' in achieving the purpose of the RMA;Resource Management Act, Section 7 - Parliament of New Zealand, 1991

Kaitiakitanga:
stewardship:
efficient use and development of natural and physical resources:
efficiency of the end use of energy:
amenity values:
intrinsic values of ecosystems:
quality of the environment:
finite characteristics of natural and physical resources:
habitat of trout and salmon:
climate change:
renewable energy.

Section 8 Treaty of Waitangi states that in achieving the purpose of the RMA, 'account shall be taken' of the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti o Waitangi).Resource Management Act, Section 7 - Parliament of New Zealand, 1991

Interpretation Under the RMA virtually all significant uses of land, air,coastal, or water-related resources are regulated by provisions of the RMA or by rules in regional or district plans or by decisions on consent applications Fisher (1991) Op cit. Plans are to achieve the purpose of the RMA which is 'sustainable management' of natural and physical resources. Most rule-making and decision-making is expressly related back to the 'Purpose and Principles' section, Part II, which contains the statutory definition of 'sustainable management' in section 5 Harris (1993). Op cit. Consequently, the interpretation that is to be placed on the definition of 'sustainable management' will be of considerable importance.

Very soon after the enactment of the RMA, Fisher (1991) wrote a substantial legal analysis of the RMA showing that the definition of 'sustainable management' was possibly ambiguous.Fisher (1991) Op cit. p 28. In spite of the 'biophysical bottom line' interpretation, as in Simon Upton's third reading speech, being perhaps the most grammatically correct,Fisher (1991) Op cit. p 17. Fisher noted that a 'single integrated purpose' definition could be made where providing for human well being was equal with and not subordinate to the 'bottom line' paragraphs a) to c) of s 5(2).Fisher (1991) Op cit. p 17.

Some six years after the enactment of the RMA, several decisions on consent applications had been appealed to the Environment Court where s5 was given some degree of interpretation. By 1997, two interpretations of s5 were recognised, 'balancing ' and the 'environmental bottom line'.Williams, D.A.R. (1997). Environmental and resource management law in New Zealand, 2nd edition, Butterworths, Wellington. However, the only common ground among the varying interpretations was the lack of consistence in the reasoning.Smith, G. (1997). The Resource Management Act 1991 "a biophysical bottom line" vs "a more liberal regime"; a dichotomy? Canterbury Law Review 6: 499-538, p 521.

By 2002, the "broad overall judgement" (a 'weighing', rather than a 'balancing' approach) was the interpretation of s5 favoured by the Environment Court.Skelton, P. and Memon, A. (2002). Adopting sustainability as an overarching environmental policy. Resource Management Journal 10(1), March 2002, p 8-9. Wheen (2002) argues that the broad overall judgement interpretation reduces 'sustainable management' to a balancing test with a bias towards tangible economic benefits over the intangible environmental concerns.Wheen, N. (2002) A history of New Zealand environmental law. pp 261-274, In Environmental histories of New Zealand, edited by Pawson, E. Brooking,T. Oxford University Press, Melbourne. p 273.

Resource consents The RMA requires that certain uses of natural resources require a specific authorisation by a resource consent. As part of an application for resource consent, an Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE), a report similar to an Environmental Impact Assessment, is required. This assessment, in theory, includes all potential impacts on the environment, including those that are only long-term, with 'sustainability' as a strong, though not yet clearly legally defined part of the Act.

Related legislation The enactment of the RMA had an effect on a large amount of Acts, regulations and orders. The notable acts to be repealed were the Town and Country Planning Act, Water and Soil Conservation Act, Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act, and the Minerals Act.Frieder, J. (1997) "Approaching Sustainability: Integrated Environmental Management and New Zealand’s Resource Management Act". Ian Axford (New Zealand) Fellowship in Public Policy, 1997. p 12. The mining and minerals regime was separated from the Resource Management Bill at the third reading stage and was enacted as the Crown Minerals Act 1991.Palmer, G. (1991). Op cit., p 9.

A total of 69 Acts and amended Acts were repealed. (See RMA Sixth Schedule)
Nineteen regulations and orders were revoked (Seventh Schedule)

Opinions The Act has regularly made headlines since its introduction, receiving the blame for the failure of a number of high profile projects, such as the Project Aqua hydro dam.

Proponents of the RMA argue that it ensures the sustainable use of resources for the foreseeable needs of the present and future generation, and also recognises the importance of indigenous rights in the mitigation process. In this respect, the RMA is a pioneering act in the area of sustainable development. Other advantages cited are the umbrella function, which (at least in theory) allows all consent decisions about a project to be considered in one process, freeing applicants from the need to research and apply for all the various permits they would otherwise have to apply for their development. It is also noted that the RMA is 'effects-based'. In other words, instead of a proposal needing to be on a list of approved or permitted developments or activities, if the applicant can prove that the effects of the development on the environment are unproblematic, then he or she is allowed to go ahead. In practice however, this proof is often elusive, especially with new or contested activities or developments.

Environment and conservation groups New Zealand's largest conservation organisation, the Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand considers that;

public participation is minimised as that 95% of all resource consents are granted without public notification,
less than 1 % of applications for consents are declined (MfE 1999-2000 survey),
businesses equate public participation with added costs, but the OECD considers New Zealand to have low environmental compliance costs,
consenting is an uneven playing field, as developers have better access to legal, planning, scientific experts than the public,
the absence of national environmental standards and national policy statements has led to inconsistency between councils. Valuing Our Environment - The costs of the RMA Kate Mitcalfe, Environmental Lawyer, Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of NZ Inc.

Business interests Critics of the act argue that the resource management process is a barrier to investment, being unpredictable, expensive, protracted and often subject to undue influence from local lobby groups, especially the indigenous Maori iwi. It's Time to Drive a Stake Through the Heart of the RMA (PDF) - the free radical, June/July 2004A typical business viewpoint is expressed by the New Zealand Business Round Table. Submission on the Resource Management (Waitaki Catchment) Amendment Bill, New Zealand Business Round Table, February 2004, paragraph 2.1The NZBR has long expressed concerns that are widely shared in the business community about the RMA. It is a cumbersome, time-consuming and costly piece of legislation that adds considerable uncertainty to business decision-making. It is a major impediment to the country's economic growth.

The Business Round Table has also argued that the RMA contains core concepts, such as sustainable management, intrinsic values, Treaty_of_Waitangi, kaitiakitanga and the definition of the environment, which are 'hopelessly fuzzy'. Contest of Environmental Policy Ideas Welcome by Roger Kerr, published in the Otago Daily Times, 20 October 2006.

Companies have used it to hinder the operations of their competitors, "We can find plenty of examples where competing businesses use the Act to restrict competition" such as "petrol stations and supermarkets". Business New Zealand Chief Executive Simon Carlaw, quoted in King, D. (2003). RMA a costly business. RMA costly to development enterprises, say business leaders. The Press, Christchurch, 3 June 2003. even though the law specifically states that business competition is not to be a factor in decisions about giving consent.Resource Management Act, Section 104(3)(a) - Parliament of New Zealand, 1991

Other business critics argue that the RMA is destructive of property rights.

Also especially criticised was the inability to restrict submissions against a project to those directly affected, and the need to go through a Council-level hearings phase even when it was already apparent that a case would eventually go to the Environment Court.

The RMA has also been blamed for preventing Project Aqua, a major hydroelectric scheme, by making compliance, respectively the compliance process, too costly. Speed up RMA, says business - New Zealand Herald, Monday 05 April 2004

Maori New Zealand's indigenous Maori have in return argued that decisions made under the RMA do not adequately take into account the interests and values of New Zealand's indigenous people. A Tangata Whenua Perspective on Sustainability using the Mauri Model - Morgan, Te Kipa Kepa Brian, 2004, paper presented at the International Conference on Sustainability Engineering and Science, Auckland, New Zealand, 7–9 July 2004

See also

District Plan (the main planning instrument of the RMA at District Council level)
Environment Court (the court dealing with Resource Management Act matters)

References

Further reading

Forest and Bird, 2004 Handbook of Environmental Law ISBN 0959785183 (Considered the standard commentary on the RMA)

External links

New Zealand Government legislation - Text of the Act (under 'Statutes', expand 'R').
The Resource Management Act 1991 The original Resource Management Act as enacted in 1991.
Ministry for the Environment RMA Web Page.
Ministry for the Environment - guide to preparing an AEE.
The Community Guide to the Resource Management Act 1991 Free Online version, navigate via left side bar, 2nd Edition, Environmental Defence Society.
RMAlink - community RMA information resource.
rma.net Court Decisions under Resource Management Act.

Resource Management Act [Ministry for the Environment]
Latest news . Thinking of building or renovating? Here's a guide to resource consents and ... This site is a gateway to information about the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA ...

Proposed National Environmental Standards for Air Quality Resource ...
Proposed National Environmental Standards for Air Quality Resource Management Act Section 32. Executive Summary. 1 Introduction. 2 Statement of the Issue

New Zealand Legislation
Provides free access to acts and regulations.

Resource Management Act 1991 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Resource Management Act (RMA) is a significant, and at times, controversial Act of Parliament passed in 1991 in New Zealand. The RMA regulates access to natural and physical ...

Resource management - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the New Zealand law, see Resource Management Act 1991. In organizational studies, resource management is the efficient and effective ...

Foreword
1 A Guide to Health Impact Assessment Foreword The introduction of the Resource Management Act 1991 has brought about a major change to the way we manage our natural and physical ...

New Zeland: New Zealand's Resource Management Act (1991)
Keywords: Environmental Framework Legislation, Policy measure, Stakeholders participation: Location: New Zeland: Time Frame: 1991 ongoing: Relevant items: - Awareness and vision

New Zealander's Guide to the Resource Management Act 1991 -
Independent New Zealand publisher & distributor of quality books, calendars, posters and New Zealand Parkmaps -

The Resource Management Act 1991
Disclaimer This consolidated version of the Resource Management Act 1991 has been formatted from existing sources and is not an official reprint produced by the Parliamentary ...

Marlborough Forest Industry Association - Environment - Resource ...
The Resource Management Act (1991) (RMA) is the principal legislation for all of New Zealand's natural resources (land, air, water and ecosystems) and physical ...